I Wanna Be The Forums!

IWBTG => General! => Topic started by: tijit on March 22, 2009, 10:15:09 pm

Title: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: tijit on March 22, 2009, 10:15:09 pm
Czech the attached image.

I win! Well, almost.. as I have never actually one-shotted the guy:

I died on the final eye... STUPID FLYING SPIKY TOOTH


But yeah, haven't video recorded it because I'm at the University and the computers here have no sound drivers. But I will do this at home at some point and do this again so it can be on youtube.


Czech the sig link
Title: Re: At the Guy on Impossible
Post by: TAYLOOP on March 22, 2009, 10:27:49 pm
Kinda Doubt It...
Title: Re: At the Guy on Impossible
Post by: OLDGREG on March 22, 2009, 10:29:53 pm
i dont hes gud
Title: Re: At the Guy on Impossible
Post by: JustOne on March 22, 2009, 11:11:41 pm
He posted a video of himself getting to mike haggar (Two videos actually)
Title: Re: At the Guy on Impossible
Post by: SilentLoner on March 22, 2009, 11:12:36 pm
You, sir, are insane.
Title: Re: At the Guy on Impossible
Post by: tijit on March 23, 2009, 02:18:11 am
You, sir, are insane.

Yes.

Quote
Kinda Doubt It...

I'm sure your doubt will disappear when I post the video. Btw this I actually did manage to defeat the guy. There must be some random glitch, when you kill the evil save, a save point must appear for a single frame, and a bullet clipped with that, so I saved there. I then went on to defeat the guy on the third or fourth attempt. And when you finish the outroduction sequence it saves, so now I have the ability to press backspace on an impossible game :3. On the menu screen, the info that says "difficulty" is blank, I think Kayin never conceived that someone would actually do the entire thing.
Title: Re: At the Guy on Impossible
Post by: Kitty on March 23, 2009, 03:53:19 am
I'm going to make a member group especially for you.
Title: Re: At the Guy on Impossible
Post by: ybbald on March 23, 2009, 04:31:13 am
On the menu screen, the info that says "difficulty" is blank, I think Kayin never conceived that someone would actually do the entire thing.
Old.

We found that out when SL hacked the save
Title: Re: At the Guy on Impossible
Post by: tijit on March 23, 2009, 06:23:21 am
I'm going to make a member group especially for you.

^____________________________^


@Dr. Furry: Yeah I figured it was already known, just thought I'd mention that I beat the guy on impossible and mention the circumstances.

EDIdiot: Yay I beat it. Too late to upload the video now *yawns* will do it tomorrow.
Title: Re: At the Guy on Impossible
Post by: Angrystu on March 23, 2009, 12:44:55 pm
Holy crap.
Title: Re: At the Guy on Impossible
Post by: Ryu6833 on March 23, 2009, 04:59:07 pm
Amazing.
Title: Re: At the Guy on Impossible
Post by: Yule on March 23, 2009, 05:08:16 pm
How often do you do this/play?
Title: Re: At the Guy on Impossible
Post by: tijit on March 23, 2009, 06:37:04 pm
Quote
How often do you do this/play?

Well, quite often I guess. Before yesterday though when I beat it I hadn't played it in about 3 weeks, so I really surprised myself by getting so far ;D


So ... I'm pretty sure I'm the first person to beat it on this difficulty... is that correct?

I really wanted something cool to happen at the very end, like when you dodge that final cherry, a giant anvil that says "impossible" comes down and destroys you. But once again, I don't think Kayin ever expected anyone to actually do it :P

Video is currently uploading.

EDIdiot: Link in my signature
Title: Re: At the Guy on Impossible
Post by: SilentLoner on March 23, 2009, 07:45:51 pm
*stares at screen in bewilderment*

. . .

I can't... Did that just... WHAT? O_O
Title: Re: At the Guy on Impossible
Post by: JustOne on March 23, 2009, 08:15:13 pm
Uh, woah
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Dagnarok on March 23, 2009, 08:48:17 pm
CONGRATU-FUCKING-LATIONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: dsk on March 23, 2009, 09:51:20 pm
I am SO sticking this.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Arkhanno on March 23, 2009, 10:35:04 pm
You, sir, are a god.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Yule on March 23, 2009, 10:47:37 pm
HOLY CRAP!
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: unreal on March 24, 2009, 12:25:59 am
* bows down  :)

....Speechless....
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: matlab on March 24, 2009, 08:19:39 am
Oh my god...

T-THATS IMPOSSIBLE!

damn you're good....

I.. I dont know what i should say here...
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Tervez on March 24, 2009, 11:46:42 am
You sir, are most awesome.


(http://i152.photobucket.com/albums/s172/Tervez/motivator4781837.jpg)


Someone make a better motivational of him, I'm not worthy.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Ellipsis on March 24, 2009, 12:06:17 pm
congrats, you even videoed it. Thats great man!
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: george94 on March 24, 2009, 12:58:58 pm
this is abasa ******** amazing, so how many deaths did you end up having? i wanna see a vid f someone finishing in 0 deaths, that'd be amazing, but i don't get it you said you died 3-4 times on the guy, but o nthe video there were no deaths
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Zaraki on March 24, 2009, 01:08:50 pm
You, sir, are insane.
gratz Tijit!
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: dsk on March 24, 2009, 02:49:55 pm
this is abasa ******** amazing, so how many deaths did you end up having? i wanna see a vid f someone finishing in 0 deaths, that'd be amazing, but i don't get it you said you died 3-4 times on the guy, but o nthe video there were no deaths
IF HE FINISHED IT ON IMPOSSIBLE...
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: matlab on March 24, 2009, 02:56:53 pm
this is abasa ******** amazing, so how many deaths did you end up having? i wanna see a vid f someone finishing in 0 deaths, that'd be amazing, but i don't get it you said you died 3-4 times on the guy, but o nthe video there were no deaths
I suppose you dont really understand what Impossible mode is all about.....
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: ybbald on March 24, 2009, 04:31:59 pm
this is abasa ******** amazing, so how many deaths did you end up having? i wanna see a vid f someone finishing in 0 deaths, that'd be amazing, but i don't get it you said you died 3-4 times on the guy, but o nthe video there were no deaths
I suppose you dont really understand what Impossible mode is all about.....
You're probably talking to someone who can't beat Tyson, so yeah
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: tijit on March 24, 2009, 07:15:20 pm
You sir, are most awesome.


(http://i152.photobucket.com/albums/s172/Tervez/motivator4781837.jpg)


Someone make a better motivational of him, I'm not worthy.

I'm definitely changing my avatar back to the gif of maid marion dancing on an acid trip
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Yule on March 24, 2009, 07:19:45 pm
I'm still in a state of shock!
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: ybbald on March 24, 2009, 07:21:06 pm
I'm still in a state of shock!
I'm in denial
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Yule on March 24, 2009, 07:26:27 pm
Denial my ass, I almost drooled because my jaw was dropped for so long.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: shaman666 on March 24, 2009, 08:07:50 pm
you're really the one and only THE GUY now, gratz
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Dagnarok on March 24, 2009, 08:11:01 pm
tijitdamijit

Making the Impossible, possible
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: george94 on March 25, 2009, 03:54:38 am
this is abasa ******** amazing, so how many deaths did you end up having? i wanna see a vid f someone finishing in 0 deaths, that'd be amazing, but i don't get it you said you died 3-4 times on the guy, but o nthe video there were no deaths
IF HE FINISHED IT ON IMPOSSIBLE...
Quote
I then went on to defeat the guy on the third or fourth attempt.[/qoute]
just sayin that implies he died a few times
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Angrystu on March 25, 2009, 07:12:52 am
this is abasa ******** amazing, so how many deaths did you end up having? i wanna see a vid f someone finishing in 0 deaths, that'd be amazing, but i don't get it you said you died 3-4 times on the guy, but o nthe video there were no deaths
IF HE FINISHED IT ON IMPOSSIBLE...
Quote
I then went on to defeat the guy on the third or fourth attempt.[/qoute]
just sayin that implies he died a few times

APPARENTLY YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND IMPOSSIBLE MODE.
THERE ARE NO SAVES.
EVERY DEATH LEAVES YOU AT THE FIRST SCREEN.

When he says "died 3-4 times on the guy", it means he had to run his ass through the whole game again 3-4 times. In his victory run, he couldn't have died.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Ellipsis on March 25, 2009, 11:54:24 am
no there is one save on impossable just before the guy. But in the youtube video it dosnt show him using this save. (the save is acturly a glitch)
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Zaraki on March 25, 2009, 12:56:23 pm
You sir, are most awesome.


(http://i152.photobucket.com/albums/s172/Tervez/motivator4781837.jpg)


Someone make a better motivational of him, I'm not worthy.

The pic says tijitdamnit... :P
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: ybbald on March 25, 2009, 01:32:41 pm
You sir, are most awesome.


http://i152.photobucket.com/albums/s172/Tervez/motivator4781837.jpg


Someone make a better motivational of him, I'm not worthy.

The pic says tijitdamnit... :P
Well damnit!
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: gameguy11 on March 25, 2009, 06:59:50 pm
i wanna see Kayin's reaction to this!
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: tijit on March 25, 2009, 07:17:16 pm
i wanna see Kayin's reaction to this!

He posted on the video
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: gameguy11 on March 25, 2009, 07:20:06 pm
all right i didn't see that.
I'm still in a state of shock!
i'll be in the state of shock til i die!
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Tervez on March 26, 2009, 06:54:01 am
The pic says tijitdamnit... :P
As I said, I'm not worthy to make proper motivational of him :P.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Applemancer on March 26, 2009, 09:19:53 pm
You, sir, are a Guy among Kids.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Khalin on March 26, 2009, 09:38:16 pm
Woah now. I'm pretty sure george94 just had a slight misunderstanding/confusion about what tijitdamijit said, so no need to beat him down over it.

To tijitdamijit: Nice work! That's pretty amazing. To-date, my best run on impossible mode [and I still feel proud of this] is getting to the Dr. Wily Mechadragon [which killed me on my way running back, and I haven't turned the game on since then]. Even if I could get to The Guy, I doubt I'd be able to kill him without dying at least a few times, so I'm extremely impressed! Quite the achievement.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: IWBT-John on March 27, 2009, 08:18:19 pm
With your eyes closed... then i will be impressed

 :P
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: tijit on March 28, 2009, 07:13:07 am
With your eyes closed... then i will be impressed

 :P

I was tempted to start a new thing, in which people take vids of themselves playing the game while there's a black thing covering the screen... thanks for reminding me!
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: gameguy11 on March 28, 2009, 09:32:03 am
With your eyes closed... then i will be impressed

 :P
With your eyes closed... then i will be impressed

 :P

I was tempted to start a new thing, in which people take vids of themselves playing the game while there's a black thing covering the screen... thanks for reminding me!
*facepalm* i hope this is a joke...
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Ktk on March 29, 2009, 04:08:33 pm
The only explanation...

YOU HACKED
SO PROOOO
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Lion on April 06, 2009, 08:43:32 pm
Didn't that Beta Tester guy do it a long time ago? There was no proof, though.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Yule on April 06, 2009, 08:55:09 pm
You mean Niku?
Nope.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Ellipsis on April 07, 2009, 01:47:44 pm
Think he did but that was when impossable was glitchy. It saved the bosses you killed but not your possition of something, anyway it was a bit easyer
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: IWBT-John on April 12, 2009, 08:00:17 pm
With your eyes closed... then i will be impressed

 :P

I was tempted to start a new thing, in which people take vids of themselves playing the game while there's a black thing covering the screen... thanks for reminding me!

No problem, i had an idea similar but without the black thing covering the screen, that is just nuts!!!
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: quanto on April 12, 2009, 08:03:44 pm
get a OLPC and go under water and do it
do it without using the gun
then i will be impressed
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on April 18, 2009, 09:39:09 pm
I've never played impossible mode, but I saw the three videos and I have a couple of questions:

On part #1 and #2 on the video you recorded the run, no deaths... except you died at Haggar's area.

You died in this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zy09rE3_O8E&feature=response_watch

At 6:43 you're dead.

I then go to video #3 which is titled "the conclusion", found here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ut46QsQtQwA&feature=response_watch

I'm assuming it's another full-run of Impossible mode without dying, but the video magically starts at The Guy's castle.

Is there a save point before Haggar on impossible mode I'm not aware of, or did you not record your passing run?


I wanted to see the full thing, from start to the guy, no deaths. Or did you post that in another video I haven't seen yet?
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Yule on April 18, 2009, 10:33:43 pm
Dude, do you not understand IMPOSSIBLE?
NO SAVE POINTS AT ALL.
Why would you set up the camera for a full run when you die at the 5th boss and have to start all over?
He got to the castle and there were no save points, therefore it was a true impossible run.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on April 19, 2009, 02:37:03 am
Why would you set up the camera for a full run when you die at the 5th boss and have to start all over?
He got to the castle and there were no save points, therefore it was a true impossible run.

Because there's people who just emulate windows and use it to make Save States of IWBTG (along with the entire OS) and then claim to have done impossible mode.

You can just save state your way through impossible, re-trying things as needed.


That's why I wanted to see a full video from start to end.

Not doubting the legitimacy of the poster, just saying, if he did it the second time around, why not post the full video from start to finish?

That's kinda what I was expecting considering he did bother to record the first attempt right from the start...

It makes you wonder why he didn't do the same for the second (passing?) attempt.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Ellipsis on April 19, 2009, 07:58:33 am
it is true that he could of just used a save at the begging of the guys castle. A full filmed run would clear up this. Personly I think its probly real though.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on April 19, 2009, 11:56:12 am
it is true that he could of just used a save at the begging of the guys castle. A full filmed run would clear up this. Personly I think its probly real though.


yeah I think it's real

but I've yet to see a full video from start to finish
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: The Halfway Kid on April 25, 2009, 08:31:47 pm
I watched him do it...on youtube, and i dont think he would go to all the trouble to acutally "fake it", and he made the time travel game, so obviously he is VERY familiar with the game, so i do belive him.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Ellipsis on April 26, 2009, 06:36:54 am
You didnt actuly "watch him do it" you just watched him play from the guys castle to the end of the game.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: tijit on April 27, 2009, 05:14:03 am
Quote
why not post the full video from start to finish?
Video files are HUGE. I don't want a whole bunch of them cluttering up my hard drive. I only wanted a vid of each part so I can edit it all together at the end.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Ellipsis on April 27, 2009, 10:35:07 am
Can you edit it all, together? It would look nicer on youtube.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Dagnarok on April 27, 2009, 11:53:19 am
Wouldn't that make the video over 11 minutes? >_<
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: tijit on April 28, 2009, 07:51:03 pm
Yeah, there's an 11 minute limit on a vid. The only way to shrink it to that size would be to speed it up x6 or something, and that's pointless because the music gets out of sync and there's no way to tell if it's genuine or not.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on April 29, 2009, 09:50:22 am
Quote
Wouldn't that make the video over 11 minutes? >_<

The video would be over or very close to 11 minutes regardless. So what? People split up their uploads all the time. It'd be called IWBTG IMPOSSIBLE PART 1 and PART 2. There that wasn't so bad.

Yeah, there's an 11 minute limit on a vid. The only way to shrink it to that size would be to speed it up x6 or something, and that's pointless because the music gets out of sync and there's no way to tell if it's genuine or not.

Every heard of splitting up your upload into 2 parts? People do it all the time.

Who cares about the music? You edit the music in or whatever later, and it won't get out of sync.


It doesn't matter if you stop at 10:59 minutes and then resume in the next video. It'd be better than how you currently have it, which has you DYING at Mike Haggard's screen and then the next video has you magically back at The Guy's Castle. THAT'S where there's really no way to tell if it's genuine or not.


A video of IWBTG on impossible from START to FINISH without any deaths is what we're getting at. How that gets uploaded to Youtube doesn't really matter.

The true difficulty of Impossible is going through all of that WITHOUT dying, and is what people wanna see.

 It's not like the first video + the second video can somehow get added up and form a full impossible run, you know. The first video only shows that your first run failed. And your passing video (which is your second one) skips 90% of the game and literally starts at The Guy's Castle.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Dagnarok on April 29, 2009, 09:53:27 am
And... it's already that way?
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on April 29, 2009, 09:55:17 am
And... it's already that way?

Nope. Did you watch the videos?

Currently it's:

Video 1: Failed run. He dies. That makes the video worthless in an impossible run, remember?

Video 2: [Assumed Off-Screen Run to the Guy's Castle without dying which no one has ever seen]
Whoosh!! Video starts at The Guy's Castle.

Video 1 is a fail video. And Video 2 doesn't even show him doing the game again without dying. It just shows him starting impossible already at The Guy's Castle. I won't get into it but there's tons of ways to cheat your game to start there, even on impossible mode.

 I'm sorry but you guys have tons of faith on something you are not even being shown.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Dagnarok on April 29, 2009, 09:57:37 am
Most people would question ANY impossible video that got split.

My question being; what's the difference between what tijit did and your method?
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on April 29, 2009, 09:59:21 am
Most people would question ANY impossible video that got split.

My question being; what's the difference between what tijit did and your method?

My method would actually show him playing from start to finish, without dying?

And not just show him playing from The Guy's Castle to the end without dying?

Also, if you're that worried about splitting, just don't use Youtube. There's tons of video sites besides Youtube that do NOT have the 11m video cap. You can upload your 30+ minute video there no problem. Or just use an older Youtube account which allows over 11m videos. You wouldn't even have to edit the video. Just compress and upload, zero editing required.

Seriously, this 11m issue has little to do with him not having a full impossible run uploaded.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Dagnarok on April 29, 2009, 10:05:05 am
Again, it would have to be one whole video then.  Otherwise, it could be debated that it's not legit, much like you could do with how it's already done.

Unless, of course, you're asking him to keep playing the game on Impossible until he's beaten it.  But by then, he may have to upload 25/67 (if not more) 11-minute videos just to show him legitimitely clearing impossible.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on April 29, 2009, 10:13:27 am
Again, it would have to be one whole video then. 

That would be great! It's too bad no one has a video like that up.

Coincidence?  ;D


Quote
Unless, of course, you're asking him to keep playing the game on Impossible until he's beaten it.  But by then, he may have to upload 25/67 (if not more) 11-minute videos just to show him legitimately clearing impossible.

Like I said the 11m issue is irrelevant, just use another video service and upload the entire thing, no cuts.

One full recorded run from start to the guy, no deaths. I'm sure that won't take that many videos / minutes. That's what a passing impossible run is. 

Coincidentally, a video of what I just described is something which no one has or has ever seen.

To be perfectly honest until I see a video like that I still think no one's done it. I thought he had it in Video #1 but he died. That's a reset and a failed run. It doesn't magically make Video #2 any more valid or somehow give him the leeway to NOT SHOW THE REST OF THE GAME on Video #2.  :)
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Dagnarok on April 29, 2009, 10:17:22 am
And considering you haven't proven how it's faked, your arguement is as valid as anyone elses. >_>
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on April 29, 2009, 10:34:51 am
And considering you haven't proven how it's faked, your arguement is as valid as anyone elses. >_>

I don't have to prove if / how he faked it. It's extremely easy to use a VM to freeze states of IWBTG, or just use the I Wanna Be The Fix program. I'm not saying his run is fake, I'm saying he doesn't have proof that he did it. Why he didn't record proof is beyond me, but that's that.

He is the one claiming he beat IWBTG on impossible. Burden of proof is on him.

Video #2 is not proof. Sorry. The only thing video #2 proves is that he can get from The Guy's Castle to The Guy without dying. An impossible run is much more than that, as seen in Video #1, where he.. uh.. dies.

Quote
One full recorded run from start to the guy, no deaths.

^ That is proof. And it's something no one has shown yet.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Dagnarok on April 29, 2009, 10:46:35 am
In case you forgot, there ARE people who believe tijit HAS been impossible, therefore the burden of proof falls on YOU to prove he faked the video.

No one actually expects every single person to believe that tijit has accomplished it; most likely knew that ANY proof of such a thing could and would be questioned/found questionable (especially given the technological powers we possess).  After all, anything you say can and will be used against you in the Court of Law (or however that statement goes).

You can go ahead and claim he hasn't provided the evidence in a manner not suitable to your liking.  Target tijit's integrity, however, and expect to be troll'd.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on April 29, 2009, 10:54:50 am
In case you forgot, there ARE people who believe tijit HAS been impossible, therefore the burden of proof falls on YOU to prove he faked the video.

Err. The people who believe his video is a full IWBTG run isn't proof of anything. They are just people who believe him. The fact (and it is a fact) is that he doesn't have a video of a full IWBTG run on impossible. Again, why he chose not to record it is beyond me, but it could very well be because he never did it.

Are you telling me that he played Video #2's run without dying, and ONLY started recording once he reached The Guy's Entrance? lmao Nah. If you get that far without dying, you make DAMN SURE it's all getting recorded.

He recorded it all for video #1, right? Why not #2? He didn't feel like he needed to show anything in Video #2.

"Just load up Entrance of The Guy and start from there, they are sure to believe me after I showed them my Video #1 of me dying near the end!!"




He makes the claim of having beaten IWBTG from start to finish without any deaths, right? Then he says: "Don't believe me? LOOK AT VIDEO #2!!!"

Then you go to video #2, but it's not an impossible run of IWBTG at all. It's a run from The Guy's Entrance to The Guy.

Again, I am not saying that his run is fake. I am saying that he has not shown proof for his claim of having beaten IWBTG on impossible.

If you want to believe him based on Video #2 then go ahead, and I am sure that is sufficient evidence for others too, but I have yet to see an IWBTG impossible run pass video, sorry to say. Not from this guy, not from anybody.

Quote
No one actually expects every single person to believe that tijit has accomplished it; most likely knew that ANY proof of such a thing could and would be questioned/found questionable .

Dude, if he just uploads a run of IWBTG on impossible from start to finish without dying, on a site without 11m time limit, ANYONE would be hard pressed to not believe it.

He just doesn't have proof like that. Why doesn't he? That's my question. If I claim to beat IWBTG on impossible mode I'd be pretty sure to have one, big, juicy, 25 minute raw un-cut video ready to upload to Vimeo to prove everyone who doesn't believe me wrong.

Quote
You can go ahead and claim he hasn't provided the evidence in a manner not suitable to your liking.  Target tijit's integrity, however, and expect to be troll'd.

I'll... be sure to watch out for the tr0lling, then. Thanks for the warning!
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Dagnarok on April 29, 2009, 11:32:28 am
Anyone who's played the game knows there are save points on ANY mode EXCEPT impossible between the Entrance and Mike Haggar.  If you didn't know that, then why the hell would you complain about the legitimacy (damn spelling >_<) of any video related to IWBTG in the first place?  Again, prove it's not legit.

If you couldn't tell by the thread title (or the 1st post in the thread), it obviously wasn't done in one video.  Otherwise, you wouldn't have the "At the Guy on Impossible" segment.
If a full-length feature is the only way you'll be satisfied, you're going to be sad for a very long time.

If you have proof that any of his other videos aren't done on Impossible, odds are that same evidence can be used against any person who does an Impossible run.  So, in reality, you no longer have any REAL method of proving someone performed an IWBTG impossible-victory without being in the room with them when it happened.

Can I get you to stop sounding so contradictory?  I mean, I have you claiming that "I am not saying that his run is fake.", yet here you are arguing about how tijit performed his IWBTG impossible run.  If it isn't fake, then he's beaten Impossible; if it is, he hasn't.  With no proof that he hasn't faked the videos, he's beaten Impossible.

The only thing you've done is claim he's shown how he cleared impossible in the wrong manner, as I suggested in the end of my last post.  And in the end, that's not going to matter.  I mean, if you uploaded videos of your impossible run of the game and you had people claim it to be fake, what would you do?  Even better, lets us your scenario; you upload a video of a IWBTG impossible run from start to finish, yet you have people claim it to be faked.  Again, what do you do?
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on April 29, 2009, 11:45:44 am
If you didn't know that, then why the hell would you complain about the legitimacy of any video related to IWBTG in the first place? 


I knew that, but I don't see what it's got to do with Video #2 not showing 90% of the run.


Quote
you upload a video of a IWBTG impossible run from start to finish, yet you have people claim it to be faked.  Again, what do you do?

Call them naysayers! The problem here is that uploading a video of IWBTG impossible run from start to finish is not what this guy did.

He uploaded a fail video (died at Mika Haggar, right?), and then uploaded a video of him playing from The Guy's Entrance to The Guy without dying on impossible.

If he has an IWBTG impossible run from start to finish, and uploads it (to Vimeo or any other service without video length restrictions?) I will seriously question anyone who doesn't believe it's legitimacy.

I would believe it especially because said video would involve zero cuts, and zero editing, because other services besides Youtube don't require you to speed up or edit your video to make it fit within any length restrictions.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Dagnarok on April 29, 2009, 11:49:24 am
If you didn't know that, then why the hell would you complain about the legitimacy of any video related to IWBTG in the first place? 


I knew that, but I don't see what it's got to do with Video #2 not showing 90% of the run.

WAIT A MINUTE!!!

Have you even SEEN the 2 other videos of his? >_>  The 1st video shows him starting the game and making it to the mine cart ride.  The 2nd video shows him playing from the mine cart ride to dying in the Mike Haggar room.  The 3rd video is him starting from the Mike Haggar room to killing the Guy.

I was starting to wonder if this might be the case. >_<  So... I'm going to wait before replying to the rest of your post.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Arkhanno on April 29, 2009, 02:08:19 pm
Again, I am not saying that his run is fake. I am saying that he has not shown proof for his claim of having beaten IWBTG on impossible.

I laughed so hard.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on April 29, 2009, 02:49:54 pm
Again, I am not saying that his run is fake. I am saying that he has not shown proof for his claim of having beaten IWBTG on impossible.

I laughed so hard.

Why? It's possible for him to not have a full video from start to end recorded
while at the same time telling the truth.

Not having the full recorded passing run doesn't automatically mean that he's lying
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Arkhanno on April 29, 2009, 03:16:48 pm
Read it again. You're saying that it's not a fake, but he doesn't have the proof to prove otherwise, hence his claim is false. Since his claim is false that means he is lying about beating the game on Impossible and the whole thing is fake.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Evan20000 on April 29, 2009, 10:39:07 pm
Archael, you may as well be saying:

The below line is true
The above line is false

-_-
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: tijit on April 29, 2009, 10:50:05 pm
@Archael:
There are 3 videos, not 2.

To clear something up:
I played and recorded this on the impossible difficulty, I played from start to finish in one sitting and I chose not to re-record the beginning because YOU'VE ALREADY SEEN ME DO THAT PART. Why the hell would you want to watch it all again when I've already got it in another vid?
I beat this game on the impossible difficulty, and nothing you say can take away that satisfaction. So you might as well say nothing at all.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Elman on April 30, 2009, 05:32:58 am
In case you forgot, there ARE people who believe tijit HAS been impossible, therefore the burden of proof falls on YOU to prove he faked the video.

"There ARE people who believe the Flying Spaguetti Monster exists, therefore the burden of the proof falls on YOU to prove He doesn't."

Huh.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Salamander on April 30, 2009, 06:43:46 am
I don't have to prove if / how he faked it. It's extremely easy to use a VM to freeze states of IWBTG, or just use the I Wanna Be The Fix program. I'm not saying his run is fake, I'm saying he doesn't have proof that he did it. Why he didn't record proof is beyond me, but that's that.
*Ahem*
You are aware that it can't change the difficulty to impossible, aren't you?

"There ARE people who believe God exists, therefore the burden of the proof falls on YOU to prove He doesn't."
Fixed.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Kwiftee on April 30, 2009, 08:13:10 am
You're never going to get any actual proof dude. A full video wouldn't do it, him beating it in FRONT OF YOU wouldn't be completely foolproof. No matter how solid it seems, it still could ALWAYS be an elaborate trick.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Ellipsis on April 30, 2009, 03:33:10 pm
You can easyly hack your save to be on impossable, Just get a mediam save and change 1 value to a 4. There you go impossable!

Also there are ways to tell if its real.
1. The hand already being out in G&G.
2. The werd stuff you get when it loads a new place (like when you enter the guys castle) this shows that this part hasnt been cut together.
3. Checking the saves when you beat the game, this helps show that you didnt save hack as people can see your saves are not at the guy.

In case you forgot, there ARE people who believe tijit HAS been impossible, therefore the burden of proof falls on YOU to prove he faked the video.
Tecnicly it falls on the person trying to say its real to prove it; along the lines of inicent till proven guilty but carry on verbaly killing each other if you whant, il go get some popcorn.


Just points, anyway who gives a shit? its bloody awesome.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on April 30, 2009, 11:05:28 pm
In case you forgot, there ARE people who believe tijit HAS been impossible, therefore the burden of proof falls on YOU to prove he faked the video.

"There ARE people who believe the Flying Spaguetti Monster exists, therefore the burden of the proof falls on YOU to prove He doesn't."

Huh.

Yeah that logical process is pretty lulzy.


Read it again. You're saying that it's not a fake, but he doesn't have the proof to prove otherwise, hence his claim is false. Since his claim is false that means he is lying about beating the game on Impossible and the whole thing is fake.

The parts in bold are where you are jumping to conclusions.

I am saying it's not necessarily fake.

I am also saying that he doesn't have a full video recorded as proof to back up his claim.

Repeating this: Just because he doesn't have proof of his claim doesn't mean he's lying.

And just because I am pointing out that he doesn't have proof doesn't automatically mean I think he's lying, either.


You are aware that it can't change the difficulty to impossible, aren't you?

No, because you can.

Quote
You're never going to get any actual proof dude. A full video wouldn't do it, him beating it in FRONT OF YOU wouldn't be completely foolproof. No matter how solid it seems, it still could ALWAYS be an elaborate trick.

Read Ellipsis' post.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Arkhanno on April 30, 2009, 11:42:59 pm
Read it again. You're saying that it's not a fake, but he doesn't have the proof to prove otherwise, hence his claim is false. Since his claim is false that means he is lying about beating the game on Impossible and the whole thing is fake.

Again, I am not saying that his run is fake. I am saying that he has not shown proof for his claim of having beaten IWBTG on impossible.

Judge: Do you have any proof of your claim of innocence?
Defendant: No, sir, I don't.
Judge: Well, then, you must be innocent. You don't have proof, but you can't be lying.

There you go: I've shown you where you are wrong for the second time. I've even made it extremely easy to tell where you're wrong. Are you an anencephalic?
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Salamander on May 01, 2009, 01:10:22 am
You are aware that it can't change the difficulty to impossible, aren't you?

No, because you can.
...Are you trying to argue with the creator of the fixer about what it can and can't do?
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Kwiftee on May 01, 2009, 02:23:22 am
I think Archael got mixed up there. YES it is possible to hack saves to change difficulty, but it can't be done with the fixer. Right?
...I've never actually hacked saves or even downloaded the fixer, so I can't be certain of this.

Also, Arkhanno, I don't think he's necessarily saying that he think's its fake. He's saying that he hasn't got enough evidence to decide either way. Which is why he wants more.


Anyway, I still stand by what I said. There's no possible way of proving that it's legit. All those things Ellipsis posted COULD be faked. What if he animated the entire video from scratch? I highly doubt anyone would ever actually do this, but it would still be possible, no?
A full video would be more evidence, but still not completely solid. The only difference is WE'RE satisfied with the evidence he gave us, while you're not.

So too bad. I doubt you're going to get any more.


EDIT: Oh hey, just something to add to this whole innocent until proven guilty argument:

I'd say that it's up to Archael to disprove it, since tijitdamijit's already given perfectly reasonable evidence, by everyone else's standards anyway.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Dagnarok on May 01, 2009, 09:52:22 am
EDIT: Oh hey, just something to add to this whole innocent until proven guilty argument:

I'd say that it's up to Archael to disprove it, since tijitdamijit's already given perfectly reasonable evidence, by everyone else's standards anyway.

And that's EXACTLY what I meant when I made the comment in the first place. >_<

tijit is innocent (of faking the impossible run) until proven guilty (of faking the impossible run).
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 02, 2009, 01:05:11 am
Read it again. You're saying that it's not a fake, but he doesn't have the proof to prove otherwise, hence his claim is false. Since his claim is false that means he is lying about beating the game on Impossible and the whole thing is fake.

Again, I am not saying that his run is fake. I am saying that he has not shown proof for his claim of having beaten IWBTG on impossible.

Judge: Do you have any proof of your claim of innocence?
Defendant: No, sir, I don't.
Judge: Well, then, you must be innocent. You don't have proof, but you can't be lying.


There you go: I've shown you where you are wrong for the second time. I've even made it extremely easy to tell where you're wrong. Are you an anencephalic?

Wtf does the judge + defendant example have anything to do with this? Nice try.

Just because someone cannot present proof of innocence doesn't mean they are guilty.

I am not automatically labeling him as guilty, I am saying he has no proof of innocence.

It is possible for him to be unable to procure proof of innocence and still be innocent.

This is the reason some innocent people are wrongly judged, it happens all the time. I can accuse tijitdamijit of being guilty, while he has no evidence to counter me, and he can still be telling the truth. This is actually a LIKELY scenario and is probably what is going on here in the first place.

Repeat: Just because he doesn't have a full un-cut video doesn't mean he is lying about it.


Quote
You don't have proof, but you can't be lying.

And yet it is very possible for him to not have proof, and not be lying (innocent unable to procure proof). Get it?


Quote
There you go: I've shown you where you are wrong for the second time. I've even made it extremely easy to tell where you're wrong.

You have shown me where you think you are right with an example that doesn't even apply.

There is a difference.


Quote
Are you an anencephalic?

No. But you really need to read what I am telling you in this post so you don't misunderstand it again.

You can be innocent while at the same time not have any proof of innocence. This is extremely likely for a great deal of accusations, and pretending like EVERYONE who doesn't have proof of innocence is automatically guilty is the only anencephalic hint that is being dropped around here.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Ellipsis on May 02, 2009, 06:54:54 am
The whole innocent till proven guilty goes like this:
You are called innocent until you are proven guilty.

Anyway your right there is almost nothing that could prove you innocent without any dout.
Best you could get:
have it shown on live web cam and have live television streaming at the same time in the video, this way the video could not be pre recorded.
This is unlikely to happen.
But doing a full run and showing your saves after would be enough evidence for just about everyone to say "I think this must be true"
If a full run was published it would remove almost almost all scepticism as there would be far less things to criticise.

Also a full run in one video (or to parts) with no slowdown and normal music would look nice to see on youtube.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: quanto on May 02, 2009, 11:19:54 am
...
hey archael
he did it...deal with it...
just because you cant do it, doesnt mean someone else cant
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 02, 2009, 11:33:59 am
...
hey archael
he did it...deal with it...

I am OK if he did, but a better video version of it would be really nice to see; kind of like this:

Quote
doing a full run and showing your saves


Quote
just because you cant do it, doesnt mean someone else cant

correct
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Rad on May 02, 2009, 11:36:17 am
k guys, i beat it on impossible last night.

yep..
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Evan20000 on May 02, 2009, 11:40:53 am
All right, I admit there is no way to 100% guarentee it's real. Although any reasonable person would be able to take the given evidence and be happy for tijitdamijit. I think that you are frustrated with the game and want to believe it is truely impossible, and would do anything within your power to disprove his claim of beating impossible mode.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Ellipsis on May 02, 2009, 12:20:10 pm
We are not saying that we would "do anything within our power to disprove his claim" we are simply stating that more evidence would defiantly strengthen his claim.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 02, 2009, 12:25:19 pm
. I think that you are frustrated with the game and want to believe it is truly impossible, and would do anything within your power to disprove his claim of beating impossible mode.

Nice theory, however;

IWBTG is fun as hell, I am not frustrated by it at all

I am sure many people have beaten it on impossible too, and never recorded it

IWBTG impossible is definitely possible

Quote
k guys, i beat it on impossible last night.

me too! my 6 part video of my impossible run will be up soon (and no I didn't use a Windows XP VM'ed to save state through it, either!!) take that!!!

all we're saying is that this thread's proof of beating it on impossible is just not very good


FYI to everyone trying to bend the "burden of proof" argument:

Although I am indeed saying that his proof isn't good enough, the OP is the person who made the claim of having beaten IWBTG in the first place. Burden of proof was on him and he did put up some videos, so it really comes down to whether you think those videos are proof enough for you or not.

Your counter-argument would be similar to the usual fallacy "You can't disprove god, therefor god must be real".

This is wrong.

Just because we don't have proof that his impossible run is fake does not automatically mean it's legit, either. If you choose to believe that it is legit (and that his proof is good enough to convince you), then more power to you.

Rest assured though, that YOUR BELIEF in his claim has ZERO impact on reality. And as far as his save files are concerned, we'll never get to verify that particular IWBTG run like has been mentioned in this thread before.

A full video from start to finish and then showing the save file after The Guy is dead would be very, very solid proof.

It's unfortunate the OP didn't provide anything like that.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: quanto on May 02, 2009, 12:34:25 pm


IWBTG is fun as hell, I am not frustrated by it at all

liar


me too! my 6 part video of my impossible run will be up soon (and no I didn't use a Windows XP VM'ed to save state through it, either!!) take that!!!

didnt you just say you want it to be 1 vid?
fail
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 02, 2009, 12:35:30 pm
liar

I am not frustrated by it at all... I finished by first playthrough of IWBTG a couple of weeks ago and playing it through again is not frustating at all

I wasn't lying when I said I am not frustrated by it anymore, it really is a very fun and well-designed game

Quote
didnt you just say you want it to be 1 vid?
fail

the sarcasm flew right by you

Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Rad on May 02, 2009, 12:55:17 pm
sodra is such a joke...
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: quanto on May 02, 2009, 12:57:12 pm
sarcasm is hard to understand for me on the internet...
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 02, 2009, 03:08:49 pm
sarcasm is hard to understand for me on the internet...

it was a joke example of a way you could record impossible with save-stated save-points in-between the videos



Quote
WAIT A MINUTE!!!

Have you even SEEN the 2 other videos of his? >_>  The 1st video shows him starting the game and making it to the mine cart ride.  The 2nd video shows him playing from the mine cart ride to dying in the Mike Haggar room. ...The 3rd video is him >>>>starting from the Mike Haggar room<<< to killing the Guy.

Yes. All three.

Look at the part of your post I bolded.

That is why I think it's fishy. He never shows you 99% of the passing run which occurred before he magically starts at the Mike Haggar room in Video #3.

He died at Mike Haggar in Video #2. That makes Video #1 and #2 worthless. They are videos of a failed run, and I don't even know why he uploaded them with the title "IWBTG ON IMPOSSIBLE"!!. Those two videos should be titled "IWBTG IMPOSSIBLE ALMOST MADE IT!", since he died at Mike Haggar.

Video #3 is of a separate run which has nothing to do with video # 1 and #2, yet you never see any of it, only the end. Video #3 magically starts at Mike Haggar and you never see ANYTHING ELSE of that run.

FYI: The game doesn't start at Mike Haggar's room.


Seriously, no one else realizes this?
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Koppis on May 02, 2009, 03:37:10 pm
Don't you get it?

The first 2 videos show that he CAN get to mike haggar on Impossible.
In the last one he just gets past it and beats the guy.
Does he really have to prove that he can get to mike haggar AGAIN?

If you don't think that makes sense, you, sir are a moron.

Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Ellipsis on May 02, 2009, 04:28:41 pm
Well I can get it from the begging of the game to the first save point, if i video that then savestate and make another video from there on to the next one and so on does that mean I beat it on impossible??? Well Iv already proven that I can make it from the begging to the first one, why should I do it again?

My point is that impossible is pulling it all off in one run without fucking up!
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Kwiftee on May 02, 2009, 06:09:23 pm
This whole argument is ridiculous.

You CAN'T GET COMPLETELY SOLID EVIDENCE.
Why the fuck can't you be happy with what he gave you like everyone else? :/
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 02, 2009, 07:46:49 pm
Don't you get it?

The first 2 videos show that he CAN get to mike haggar on Impossible.

]In the last one he just gets past it and beats the guy.
Does he really have to prove that he can get to mike haggar AGAIN?

Ellipsis post addresses this question nicely, so going to copy it here:

Well I can get it from the begging of the game to the first save point, if i video that then savestate and make another video from there on to the next one and so on does that mean I beat it on impossible??? Well Iv already proven that I can make it from the begging to the first one, why should I do it again?

My point is that impossible is pulling it all off in one run without fucking up!



Don't YOU get it? I can get to Mecha-Birdo on impossible, and then some. Does that mean I can start an impossible video AFTER Mecha-Birdo and go from there just because I CAN do it? I'm sorry, that just won't work with a claim as huge as this.

This guy CAN do 5 bosses on impossible mode; and has a straight up un-cut video of him doing it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukYFbUAAR1U

^ Are you telling me that because HE CAN kill 5 bosses, his recording for impossible mode should start after the 5th boss and only show from there to The Guy?

lmao That's what I thought.

An impossible IWBTG passing run is not a video from the furthest YOU CAN get to to The Guy, man.

An impossible IWBTG passing run is from THE START OF THE GAME, TO THE GUY.



Quote
If you don't think that makes sense, you, sir are a moron.

Can anyone around here try and make their points without resorting to insults?

Anyway, I understand how it makes sense. But unfortunately, it making sense has little to do with it being good evidence of his claim.

Quote
Why the fuck can't you be happy with what he gave you like everyone else? :/

Because it's a pretty big claim.

A claim like beating IWBTG on impossible better be backed up by fucking SOLID evidence.

I understand why some would believe him based on those videos, don't get me wrong! Video #1 and #2 as independent, separate segment runs of IWBTG impossible are impressive. Video #3 as well. But unfortunately none of those is an IWBTG Impossible passing run, ESPECIALLY not Video #3.

And IWBTG impossible passing run is what this guy is claiming.

Like I said before, the game doesn't start at Mike Haggar.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: quanto on May 02, 2009, 08:17:39 pm
either accept it
shut up
go away
or go suck a duck
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 02, 2009, 08:18:58 pm
either accept it
shut up
go away
or go suck a duck

(http://i43.tinypic.com/20fdtoi.png)

Why does that not surprise me?

Anyways, sorry, I won't accept it. It's half-ass evidence for a very, very big claim. That 5 boss video run I linked is more impressive to me than these "IWBTG on Impossible" videos I see on this thread.

Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: ybbald on May 02, 2009, 08:22:11 pm
Archael just sucks

Unless Tijit can sit down an do an impossible run at whim, why would he record every single run? There's so many places to fuck up, it'd just extra lag for no reason. Now when he reaches a place where it turns out he's on a good impossible run (liek at the start of the castle) it becomes worthwhile to turn on the camera.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: quanto on May 02, 2009, 08:25:03 pm
either accept it
shut up
go away
or go suck a duck

(http://i43.tinypic.com/20fdtoi.png)

Why does that not surprise me?

Anyways, sorry, I won't accept it. It's half-ass evidence for a very, very big claim. That 5 boss video run I linked is more impressive to me than these "IWBTG on Impossible" videos I see on this thread.



your more of a faggot that i thought you were...
i was actully trying to understand it...
wow...just...wow...
you blew it
screw you
go away
go suck a duck
better yet, go get gang raped
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 02, 2009, 08:27:12 pm
Archael just sucks

nice

Quote
Unless Tijit can sit down an do an impossible run at whim, why would he record every single run?

His presentation on Video #3 ASSUMES that he can do it on a whim, doesn't it?

Video #3 starts at Mike Haggar, which implies that he wants you to think that he can do it all ON A WHIM, so the only thing he had left to show you was Mike Haggar to The Guy.

Think about it. By asking you to believe Video #3 as proof, he's asking you to believe he can do EVERYTHING ELSE before that room on a whim.

 
Quote
There's so many places to fuck up, it'd just extra lag for no reason.

Exactly why Impossible IWBTG is so hard, and exactly why NO ONE has a full video of it. The only one claiming to have done it is this guy, and his proof doesn't show that.

Quote
Now when he reaches a place where it turns out he's on a good impossible run (liek at the start of the castle) it becomes worthwhile to turn on the camera.

Hahaha if you seriously believe that to be the reason he HAPPENED to not record his entire passing run, then you'd believe anything.

I'm sorry, I'm not buying it. Too easy to modify / save state an impossible save file to start at Mike Haggar and record from there. If he had a full IWBTG passing run, he would have posted it. But he doesn't

Who the hell goes through IWBTG from start to finish on impossible and doesn't record it?

The entire thing is worth recording, he just doesn't have a passing run video, end of story.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 02, 2009, 08:27:57 pm
either accept it
shut up
go away
or go suck a duck

(http://i43.tinypic.com/20fdtoi.png)

Why does that not surprise me?

Anyways, sorry, I won't accept it. It's half-ass evidence for a very, very big claim. That 5 boss video run I linked is more impressive to me than these "IWBTG on Impossible" videos I see on this thread.



your more of a faggot that i thought you were...
i was actully trying to understand it...
wow...just...wow...
you blew it
screw you
go away
go suck a duck
better yet, go get gang raped

The quality of your posts just knows no bottom.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: quanto on May 02, 2009, 08:29:26 pm
go suck a duck
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 02, 2009, 08:33:20 pm
go suck a duck

I believe "go suck a dick" would have a little more of the impact you're looking for. Unfortunately spamming insults isn't doing much for either the sake of tmnjdjtn's evidence or your ability to understand what is being said to you.

Don't worry, I won't put you on ignore like those 7 other guys did.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: tijit on May 02, 2009, 08:37:13 pm
Quote
This guy CAN do 5 bosses on impossible mode; and has a straight up un-cut video of him doing it:

Perhaps you don't quite get the meaning of 'uncut'. This is not uncut - he sped it up and redid the audio. Same as I did for part I, due to the fact that everyone's seen all that done before and watching a normal-speed version would just be boring.

@everybody: Some of you believe me and some of you don't. Good? Are we happy? Okay now shut the fuck up.

Quote
This is a pointless argument
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 02, 2009, 08:39:35 pm
Quote
This guy CAN do 5 bosses on impossible mode; and has a straight up un-cut video of him doing it:

Perhaps you don't quite get the meaning of 'uncut'. This is not uncut -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukYFbUAAR1U

^ That is uncut. There are no breaks between the recording.

But if you REALLY want to argue semantics as if that pointed anything wrong with the video I linked:

I don't care about the audio or the speed you edit the video to run at. Speeding up a video to fit within Youtube's 11m time limit on some accounts isn't cheating.

Also, arguing whether that video is "uncut" or not says nothing about why I posted it. I posted it to make a point.

Which was this:

An impossible IWBTG passing run is not a video from the furthest YOU CAN get to to The Guy.

PS: The game doesn't start at Mike Haggar.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: tijit on May 02, 2009, 08:43:16 pm
I didn't start at Mike Haggar. I started at the beginning of the game. I started recording at the beginning of the Guy's castle.
Can we stop this now? It's getting on my nerves.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 02, 2009, 08:47:24 pm
I didn't start at Mike Haggar. I started at the beginning of the game. I started recording at the beginning of the Guy's castle.
Can we stop this now? It's getting on my nerves.

Next time you claim to do something sick amazing, be sure to record all of it, not just the last 5%.

Like I said before, if you are able to beat all of IWBTG on Impossible, you'd be CRAZY not to show off the entire thing.

Asking us to believe Video #3 as proof just because you showed yourself dying at Mike Haggar before is pretty lul.

You said you are OK with leaving it at some people believing you and some people not believing you. As long as all I see is Mike Haggar ---> The Guy, I won't believe such a huge claim, sorry.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: ybbald on May 02, 2009, 08:48:59 pm
His presentation on Video #3 ASSUMES that he can do it on a whim, doesn't it?

Video #3 starts at Mike Haggar, which implies that he wants you to think that he can do it all ON A WHIM, so the only thing he had left to show you was Mike Haggar to The Guy.

Think about it. By asking you to believe Video #3 as proof, he's asking you to believe he can do EVERYTHING ELSE before that room on a whim.

No no no no
He never claimed he can do impossible run 100% of the time
He claimed to do it ONCE
ONCE

Holy fuck, when the fuck did he say he could do impossible every time he tried?
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 02, 2009, 08:50:01 pm
His presentation on Video #3 ASSUMES that he can do it on a whim, doesn't it?

Video #3 starts at Mike Haggar, which implies that he wants you to think that he can do it all ON A WHIM, so the only thing he had left to show you was Mike Haggar to The Guy.

Think about it. By asking you to believe Video #3 as proof, he's asking you to believe he can do EVERYTHING ELSE before that room on a whim.

No no no no
He never claimed he can do impossible run 100% of the time
He claimed to do it ONCE
ONCE

Holy fuck, when the fuck did he say he could do impossible every time he tried?

You're right. He never did. Probably cuz he can't. But anyway, the ONE TIME he did do it, he didn't record it.

Too bad huh?
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: ybbald on May 02, 2009, 08:52:32 pm
Because it'd just be excess lag and effort when most of the time he's not going to do it. And he did record it ,when it became obvious he SHOULD

Fuck you and the whore you rode in on, you can't listen to reason ,you are just doing this for attention because you are a retarded child whose parents are tired of babysitting, so they sic'd on us here at IWBTF. Go back to breastfeeding, no one cares what you say.
/me ignores
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 02, 2009, 09:01:14 pm
Quote
He claimed to do it ONCE

Yeah. He claimed to beat IWBTG impossible from start to finish, ONCE.

Guess what. He didn't record it. Not ONCE.

Because it'd just be excess lag and effort when most of the time he's not going to do it. And he did record it ,when it became obvious he SHOULD

What excess lag? If he's worried about lag he shouldn't be trying to record such a crazy hard challenge on a CPU not fast enough to handle a game + a rec program.

He didn't record a passing run. I am sorry.

All he recorded was Mike Haggar ---> The Guy. He doesn't have an IWBTG impossible passing run. If you want to believe him anyway, go ahead.

But don't get angry just because other people aren't as easily convinced as you are.


Quote
Fuck you and the whore you rode in on, you can't listen to reason ,you are just doing this for attention because you are a retarded child whose parents are tired of babysitting, so they sic'd on us here at IWBTF. Go back to breastfeeding, no one cares what you say.

Insults when people disagree with you?

That's a sure fire way to shoot down opposing views. Keep it up!
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: ybbald on May 02, 2009, 09:03:20 pm
1) the longer the video, the more lags it creates

2) He has the whole run broken up into two parts like you suggested earlier, you hypocrite.

3) I insult stupid people, get over it
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 02, 2009, 09:06:57 pm
1) the longer the video, the more lags it creates

That's some shitty rec software!

Quote
2) He has the whole run broken up into two parts like you suggested earlier, you hypocrite.

Nope. Video #1 and #2 are not of a passing run, remember? Those don't count. He died.

Video #3 is the "passing run", and guess what, all it shows is Mike Haggar ---> The Guy.

IWBTG, as you know, doesn't start at Mike Haggar.

You don't have to take my word for any of this, it's all in his videos.


Quote
3) I insult stupid people, get over it

Oh ok. I was just making sure you did it out of frustration and didn't actually believe it made you any less wrong.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Salamander on May 02, 2009, 10:25:50 pm
You've seen him play through impossible from start -> Mike Haggar.  Is it so hard for you to believe in a few more attempts he could surpass Mike Haggar?
The way you are trying to attack this makes me wonder if you just have it stuck in your head that because the difficulty is listed as impossible, it should really be impossible for a human to complete.  If this is the case, please just go away now.  Its annoying.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 02, 2009, 10:36:12 pm
You've seen him play through impossible from start -> Mike Haggar.  Is it so hard for you to believe in a few more attempts he could surpass Mike Haggar?

When you put it that way, no. I just wish he would have recorded the passing run. All of it.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Yule on May 02, 2009, 11:10:18 pm
GODDAMNIT IT PEOPLE!
This is the best we have got!
Stop acting petty, this entire argument is getting on my nerves.
This run is the most substantial evidence we have.
If Kayin accepts it, the CREATOR, then we should too!
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: quanto on May 02, 2009, 11:25:48 pm
You've seen him play through impossible from start -> Mike Haggar.  Is it so hard for you to believe in a few more attempts he could surpass Mike Haggar?

When you put it that way, no. I just wish he would have recorded the passing run. All of it.
your more fucking stupid than my brother...
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 02, 2009, 11:42:50 pm
You've seen him play through impossible from start -> Mike Haggar.  Is it so hard for you to believe in a few more attempts he could surpass Mike Haggar?

When you put it that way, no. I just wish he would have recorded the passing run. All of it.
your more fucking stupid than my brother...

Is your brother, really, really stupid?
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: quanto on May 02, 2009, 11:45:08 pm
less dumber than you
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 03, 2009, 12:14:08 am
less dumber than you

10/10 Cleverness  ;D
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: quanto on May 03, 2009, 12:14:48 am
great...
now go away
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Yule on May 03, 2009, 12:16:54 am
Alright, STOP IT!
Stay on topic or this will get ugly for both of you.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Evan20000 on May 03, 2009, 12:18:08 am
Quote
Your counter-argument would be similar to the usual fallacy "You can't disprove god, therefor god must be real".

No.

That arquement is used (and is flawed) when there is no evidence towards the subject. Here we have an ample amount of evidence toward subject, so it's up to you to find counter evidence or say nothing.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: quanto on May 03, 2009, 12:21:57 am
right...
OT~
great job man
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Fidel CashFlow on May 03, 2009, 01:58:08 am
ohhhh lawl

people that think that just because they cant do something, that it must be a lie if someone else can do it flawlessly... people like archael... retarded people.... people that get into fights.... and lose
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Rad on May 03, 2009, 02:10:10 am
ok, this is just ridiculously stupid...
Personally i Believe him, I don't know why he would lie about it...
So what if it's not a video from start to finish....
Sure, it's what people want to see but you can't expect him to just re do it again because he didn't catch it all.

Say I beat Persona 3 FES, with 100%, but i didn't record it... i wouldn't want to redo EVERYTHING just to have some dumb people from the internet to actually believe it.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: tijit on May 03, 2009, 06:00:07 am
Stop acting petty, this entire argument is getting on my nerves.

Same.
The only person being petty is archael (well, and the people who keep shitting insults at him), I've told him to cut the crap on more than one occasion and he hasn't. Also, he started it, I was here first, and whatever other childish excuses that exist, I'm too tired to think of any more right now.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: matlab on May 03, 2009, 06:12:50 am
Say I beat Persona 3 FES, with 100%, but i didn't record it... i wouldn't want to redo EVERYTHING just to have some dumb people from the internet to actually believe it.
No better way to say it.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Ellipsis on May 03, 2009, 06:29:56 am
It could be true but maby not. More evidence if you do a future run would be very nice. AND can people stop god dam throwing insults at each other! It doesn't help at all.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 03, 2009, 08:28:28 am
Quote
Your counter-argument would be similar to the usual fallacy "You can't disprove god, therefor god must be real".

No.

That arquement is used (and is flawed) when there is no evidence towards the subject. Here we have an ample amount of evidence toward subject, so it's up to you to find counter evidence or say nothing.

Alright. From this end, the counter-evidence I can gather is this:

He hasn't shown you anything but gameplay from Mike Haggar to the guy. He also showed you that he can get the segments in part 1 and part 2 done (though not necessarily together without a grace period in between)

The fact that he doesn't have a full IWBTG Impossible run is on his youtube channel. He simply doesn't. All he has is Mike Haggar --> The Guy. Go check out his channel!

He's claiming that he did a full passing run of IWBTG on impossible.

He hasn't shown you a full passing run of IWBTG on impossible.

That's my evidence.

You believe him because you feel his incomplete evidence is admissible, not because he has proved that he did it, because his videos are FAR from proof.

He only showed you that he CAN DIE at Mke Haggar, then showed you him playing from Mike Haggar to The Guy.

News flash: Adding a failed run to Mike Haggar + a passing run FROM Mike Haggar does not mean he completed IWBTG on impossible. I'm sure that's what he'd love you to think, though.

Quote
ohhhh lawl

people that think that just because they cant do something, that it must be a lie if someone else can do it flawlessly... people like archael... retarded people....

I already said I have zero problem with other people that are able to do things that I can't. Did you even read the thread and my other posts? I already said that there's probably tons of people who have done IWBTG on impossible and have never recorded it. Except the OP in this thread is claiming it, with shitty evidence to show for it.

Quote
people that get into fights.... and lose

Like people who get into fights and claim victory automatically?

You see, the very fact that you're claiming victory over an argument you haven't even participated in much seems to suggest that you don't really believe that victory is self-evident for your side. You haven't really disproven much of what I have said, which is- you guessed it, that OP has no real videos of a passing run.




Quote
So what if it's not a video from start to finish....
Sure, it's what people want to see but you can't expect him to just re do it again because he didn't catch it all.

I expect him to have a FULL RECORDED RUN, because a FULL RUN is WHAT HE'S CLAIMING!

Seriously, you guys are SO easily convinced. I could probably convince you guys that I am Kayin's little sister.


Quote
Say I beat Persona 3 FES, with 100%, but i didn't record it... i wouldn't want to redo EVERYTHING just to have some dumb people from the internet to actually believe it.


Dude. tjnsmtskt' does want some dumb people from the internet to believe it. That's why he made the claim, remember? If he didn't care about people believing it, he wouldn't be saying he beat IWBTG on impossible.

If he expects people from the internet to believe it, and he does judging from this thread he had better come with DAMN good evidence.

Like I said before, IWBTG on Impossible is NOT a small claim to make. You better have DAMN good evidence to show for it, but so far, I am seeing more evidence that he just started that 2nd run right at Mike Haggar than anything else.



right...
OT~
great job man

^ Next time when you have no way to better fight someone else's ideas, don't resort to insults. That's how the off-topic chain started.

If you are the type of person that can't stand dissenting ideas, and at the same time are not smart enough to come up with anything worthy of saying to counter them, then just don't post.

I don't believe in tnksmsjt' videos or his claim.

If you do, LHC Mutant, then that's fine, but don't come in here insulting others with quality material like "Go suck a duck" just because you have no better way of disagreeing.

Your insult posts were really not even funny, not even on the troll level.


Quote
AND can people stop god dam throwing insults at each other! It doesn't help at all.

@ Ellipsis; that's the only way some people know of disagreeing.

Especially when they see the other side might just have a point, or might actually be right, it frustrates people like that to no end, so you see insults.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Rad on May 03, 2009, 11:41:04 am
Quote
So what if it's not a video from start to finish....
Sure, it's what people want to see but you can't expect him to just re do it again because he didn't catch it all.

I expect him to have a FULL RECORDED RUN, because a FULL RUN is WHAT HE'S CLAIMING!
EXACTLY! you expect a full recorded run, no one else does. and he never said he has a full run recorded successfully.
Quote
Quote
Say I beat Persona 3 FES, with 100%, but i didn't record it... i wouldn't want to redo EVERYTHING just to have some dumb people from the internet to actually believe it.


Dude. tjnsmtskt' does want some dumb people from the internet to believe it. That's why he made the claim, remember? If he didn't care about people believing it, he wouldn't be saying he beat IWBTG on impossible.

DUMB people, not intelligent Respectable people.

Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 03, 2009, 11:47:22 am
EXACTLY! you expect a full recorded run, no one else does. and he never said he has a full run recorded successfully.

So a recorded run of Mike Haggar --> The Guy is what you expect when someone tells you they beat all of IWBTG on Impossible?

It's definitely not what I expect. You expect / are convinced by way too little IMO.


Quote
DUMB people, not intelligent Respectable people.

Quite the contrary I think. If some people are dumb enough to think Mike Haggar --> The Guy video is proof of a FULL IWBTG impossible run, I don't think he is appealing to intelligent respectable people.

If you analyze what he is presenting in a reasonable way it's easy to see that what he is showing is the last 5% of a claimed IWBTG Impossible pass run. The game doesn't start at Mike Haggar.

Remember, he didn't claim that he can do Mike Haggar --> The Guy.

He's actually claiming he beat the whole thing, from start to end, and his excuse is that he only HAPPENED to turn on the recording program when he got to Mike Haggar, because he didn't feel like recording the rest of the run, since he already showed himself dying at Mike Haggar previously on his failed run.


Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Rad on May 03, 2009, 11:49:11 am
but, i never said it was proof of a FULL IWBTG run... I just said it's good enough proof to prove he was there on impossible.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 03, 2009, 11:51:04 am
but, i never said it was proof of a FULL IWBTG run... I just said it's good enough proof to prove he was there on impossible.

Oh, I totally agree with that.

It's proof that he was there on impossible.

It's not proof that he beat IWBTG on impossible.

Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Rad on May 03, 2009, 11:57:18 am
but he did beat the guy, when he was there on impossible, with shown evidence.

If he was there on Impossible, and beat the guy, I'd believe that evidence.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 03, 2009, 12:08:09 pm
but he did beat the guy, when he was there on impossible, with shown evidence.

If he was there on Impossible, and beat the guy, I'd believe that evidence.

I'd believe it too, that's not the issue here.

My point is that anyone can be anywhere in IWBTG impossible at any given time and start the recording ANYWHERE. (Like... say, Mike Haggar's room.)

You can save-state IWBTG, you know this, right? It's called a Virtual Machine Windows XP.

And now you can just use the Save Fixer.

He showed Mike-Haggar --> The Guy. He doesn't show anything before that. The video is proof of Mike-Haggar --> The Guy. Video is not proof of a full IWBTG Impossible mode run. Makes sense now?
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: matlab on May 03, 2009, 12:27:37 pm
I'd believe it too, that's not the issue here.
[kidsvoice]WHAT?![/kidsvoice]
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: ybbald on May 03, 2009, 01:05:46 pm
Insults don't help, but they're fun ^_^
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Evan20000 on May 03, 2009, 01:20:15 pm
This conversation is retarded.

You do realize that recording software makes IWBTG WAY more likely to crash and/or lag, right? I think he showed us the end to prove he did it.

Archael, I challenge you to battle a laggy mother brain, or go through a laggy spike corridor.



Also, weather he actually did finish impossible is irrelevant anymore. You come into a website that you have no prior business in and start trying to debunk claims backed solid evidence with illogical arguements and "facts". That would put you in the category of "common internet troll".
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 03, 2009, 02:50:01 pm
You do realize that recording software makes IWBTG WAY more likely to crash and/or lag, right?

Archael, I challenge you to battle a laggy mother brain, or go through a laggy spike corridor.

That depends on the computer you use. Some computers can handle IWBTG and a 30 FPS recording program with zero slow-down and no more crashing than IWBTG normally does.

Look at this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CySvhUDBS2A&feature=channel_page

Recorded in HD quality and NO SLOWDOWN, no crashes. He did that for some other IWBTG vids too.

Just because you're recording a game with a trashy CPU doesn't mean that's how it is for everyone, so think before making generalizations.


Quote
I think he showed us the end to prove he did it.

No shit?

The funny part is you actually believe it. You believe his passing IWBTG Impossible claim while all he has to show you is a Mike Haggar --> The Guy video instead of the full run.

Repeating it here: You ARE aware anyone can modify a save file to start at Mike Haggar and just show from there, right? Anyone could save state through IWBTG impossible, as well, with a Virtual Machine.


Quote
Also, weather he actually did finish impossible is irrelevant anymore.

It's pretty relevant when someone can make a claim of something, show proof of 5% of it, and the entire site believes it just cuz of a video from Mike Haggar ---> The Guy.

Quote
You come into a website that you have no prior business in and start trying to debunk claims backed solid evidence with illogical arguements and "facts". That would put you in the category of "common internet troll".

I'm not trying to troll. If you want to dismiss what I'm saying as trolling so you won't have to go through the trouble of dismissing it logically, go ahead.

Like I said before, you are free to believe what you want, it won't make his proof any less shitty.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Ellipsis on May 03, 2009, 03:13:55 pm
claims backed solid evidence with illogical arguements
Just because you think that its solid evidence dosn't make it that, personaly its very bad evidence.
The only real thing reason anyone would ever believe it is because he has made previous good impossible runs. This however does now make THIS evidence any stronger.

but he did beat the guy, when he was there on impossible, with shown evidence.

If he was there on Impossible, and beat the guy, I'd believe that evidence.
If you believe that evidence then I have also beaten the game on impossible, even though I just used a hacked save. Now please give me the respect I deserve for in your eyes beating the game on impossible.

[kidsvoice]WHAT?![/kidsvoice]
I couldn't agree more with you, this whole thread is:
[kidsvoice]WHAT?![/kidsvoice]
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: quanto on May 03, 2009, 03:15:04 pm
...all right archael...
shut up, and listen

hey tijitdamijit, did you upload the iwbtg impossible vids simultaneously, or seperate?
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 03, 2009, 03:34:28 pm
...all right archael...
shut up, and listen

hey tijitdamijit, did you upload the iwbtg impossible vids simultaneously, or seperate?

I don't see how this will reveal anything about the run or the videos. Videos get uploaded when the user feels like it, and time of upload has no bearing whatsoever on how  / when the videos were recorded.

Quote
Just because you think that its solid evidence dosn't make it that, personaly its very bad evidence.
The only real thing reason anyone would ever believe it is because he has made previous good impossible runs. This however does now make THIS evidence any stronger.

If you believe that evidence then I have also beaten the game on impossible, even though I just used a hacked save. Now please give me the respect I deserve for in your eyes beating the game on impossible.

^ THIS!!!!

If a guy starts a video on Labyrinth of the guy on impossible, and goes Labyrinth --> The Guy on impossible, will you ALSO believe him if he claims to having finished ALL of IWBTG Impossible?

Because that's what you are believing from tijitdamijit.



An impossible IWBTG passing run is not a video from the furthest YOU CAN get to to The Guy.

An impossible IWBTG passing run is from THE START OF THE GAME, TO THE GUY. That's what makes impossible so difficult in the first place!

Of course, the difficulty of Impossible goes away almost completely when you can just *POOF* show up at Mike Haggar magically. And yes, I am suggesting that a lot of people hack their impossible saves. It's incredibly easy to do so, then just record from there.

He went from Mike Haggar to The Guy. That's great, impressive, well done. No one's trying to say he's bad at the game. But where's the full IWBTG Run?

Because FYI: A full run is what he's claiming he did.

No matter how much you try to argue in favor of tijitdamijit,, the facts are right on his channel. He simply doesn't have a full IWBTG Impossible run to show for his claim of IWBTG on Impossible. This game doesn't start at Mike Haggar.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: matlab on May 03, 2009, 04:10:26 pm
*yawn*
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: quanto on May 03, 2009, 04:15:40 pm
im going to end this no matter what...

he CAN do an impossible run
he went to beginning to mike, mike to guy
there
he can
deal with it
shut up
go away
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 03, 2009, 04:21:19 pm
Quote
he CAN do an impossible run

That's great that he CAN do it. I don't believe he actually did, though.

Quote
he went to beginning to mike, mike to guy

No, he went from beginning to DEAD. He died at end of Video #2. Watch the video.

If you DIE in impossible, it's BACK TO THE BEGINNING, remember?

Then he somehow magically teleports from the BEGINNING OF THE GAME to Mike.

Didn't feel like recording it again my ass.

He recorded the first failed run with video 1 and 2. So why would he bother to UPLOAD THE FAILED RUN, then refuse to record the PASSING RUN all the way to The Guy?

I'm sorry bro, your reasoning makes little sense. The more you try to reason it like that the more it sounds like he just hacked his save file to start at Mike Haggar and opened the recording from there.

Stick to insults, LHC Mutant.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: matlab on May 03, 2009, 04:28:40 pm
shut up
go away
you too
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Evan20000 on May 03, 2009, 05:07:18 pm
If you guys don't want to believe he did it, that's fine. I really don't care anymore.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Ellipsis on May 03, 2009, 05:32:38 pm
Weather of not he did it is almost irrelevant, what is relevant is that he doesn't have enough evidence to support his claim of beating the game on impossible.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Fidel CashFlow on May 03, 2009, 05:34:39 pm
Weather of not he did it is almost irrelevant, what is relevant is that he doesn't have enough evidence to support his claim of beating the game on impossible.
those are both equally relevant... >_>

how does he not have enough?, we all saw from mike hagar - the guy... and there was no savepoints... HMMMMMM meaning that he was on impossible... >_>
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: yoshi on May 03, 2009, 06:08:09 pm
You do realize how many chances there are to die in the whole game?
How many death traps there are?
How many places where it's a simple mistake and then you lose?
When a person starts an impossible run, they don't know how far they are gonna get.
Do you realize how inefficient it is to record thousands of tries, many of them dying really early on?
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Salamander on May 03, 2009, 06:57:09 pm
And now you can just use the Save Fixer.
Again, no it can't.  Stop claiming it can, its really annoying.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Lion on May 03, 2009, 07:12:11 pm
Let's sum this up.

@Archael: You're a fucking fagot, shut the fuck up and go away. :)
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 03, 2009, 07:21:04 pm
Let's sum this up.

@Archael: You're a fucking fagot, shut the fuck up and go away. :)

1/5 would not read it again sorry


You are right Salamander, you can't use IWBTF to alter it, but you can still use a VM to save the state of the program at whatever point you like. If you think it's impossible to cheat Impossible difficulty mode (or just hacking the file) you're wrong.

Quote
how does he not have enough?, we all saw from mike hagar - the guy... and there was no savepoints... HMMMMMM meaning that he was on impossible... >_>

You can have "save points" in impossible by freezing the state of the program in a Virtual Machine. They save the state any .exe's are running in as well.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Lion on May 03, 2009, 07:23:31 pm
Here are 2 choices Archael.

1. Get your thumb out of your ass and go away.
2. Stick both thumbs up your ass and try to walk away on your elbows.

Either way, you should leave. ;D
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: quanto on May 03, 2009, 07:24:10 pm
the title said he beat the guy on impossible, which he did...
end of story
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 03, 2009, 07:24:53 pm
Here are 2 choices Archael.

1. Get your thumb out of your ass and go away.
2. Stick both thumbs up your ass and try to walk away on your elbows.

Either way, you should leave. ;D

How about this one:

3. You actually defend tmdntjdt or contribute something worthwhile instead of trying to pass off for a semblance of a failure of a troll

Quote
the title said he beat the guy on impossible, which he did...
end of story

You are right. He did beat the guy on impossible. The videos show him doing it.

It's too bad the videos don't show him doing the whole thing on impossible, though.  :) That is something I think everybody would love to see, but no one has a video like that.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Lion on May 03, 2009, 07:26:22 pm
Oh my god, this guy's almost as big of an asshat as Sodra!
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: quanto on May 03, 2009, 07:29:30 pm
You've seen him play through impossible from start -> Mike Haggar.  Is it so hard for you to believe in a few more attempts he could surpass Mike Haggar?

When you put it that way, no. I just wish he would have recorded the passing run. All of it.
your more fucking stupid than my brother...
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Lion on May 03, 2009, 07:30:39 pm
You've seen him play through impossible from start -> Mike Haggar.  Is it so hard for you to believe in a few more attempts he could surpass Mike Haggar?

When you put it that way, no. I just wish he would have recorded the passing run. All of it.
your more fucking stupid than my brother...

Didn't see that.
But still, it's true!
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 03, 2009, 07:32:33 pm
You've seen him play through impossible from start -> Mike Haggar.  Is it so hard for you to believe in a few more attempts he could surpass Mike Haggar?

When you put it that way, no. I just wish he would have recorded the passing run. All of it.
your more fucking stupid than my brother...

Didn't see that.
But still, it's true!

By "no" I meant "no, it's not that hard to believe". Meaning I understand why you guys believe him.

But I'm with Ellipsis on this one. It's too easy to cheat your way into any screen on Impossible and then record from there.

I still don't see a full run anywhere. Sorry.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: quanto on May 03, 2009, 07:34:12 pm
...ill be back in a couple...
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Rad on May 03, 2009, 07:35:17 pm
Quote from: tijitdamijit
I BEAT THE GUY ON IMPOSSIBLE: WATCH

He never really did claim he did it from very start to finish...
He just claims that he beat him on impossible.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Lion on May 03, 2009, 07:36:52 pm
Quote from: tijitdamijit
I BEAT THE GUY ON IMPOSSIBLE: WATCH

He never really did claim he did it from very start to finish...
He just claims that he beat him on impossible.

Archael's argument was just destroyed.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: quanto on May 03, 2009, 07:37:37 pm
it is true that he could of just used a save at the begging of the guys castle. A full filmed run would clear up this. Personly I think its probly real though.


yeah I think it's real


but I've yet to see a full video from start to finish

YOU FUCKING THINK ITS REAL!
YOU FUCKING STARTED THIS FLAME WAR FOR NOTHING!
what the fuck is wrong with you?
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Lion on May 03, 2009, 07:39:30 pm
what the fuck is wrong with you?

Maybe the Swine Flu made him retarded...
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 03, 2009, 07:40:52 pm
Quote from: tijitdamijit
I BEAT THE GUY ON IMPOSSIBLE: WATCH

He never really did claim he did it from very start to finish...
He just claims that he beat him on impossible.

Archael's argument was just destroyed.

If it was, then that means ijdntwbbr never did / claimed to have finished IWBTG on impossible.

 :)

Looks like you just admitted that no one's done it, then, including him.

Quote
YOU FUCKING THINK ITS REAL!
YOU FUCKING STARTED THIS FLAME WAR FOR NOTHING!
what the fuck is wrong with you?

I said that the video does show him killing The Guy on impossible. They do not show him doing all of IWBTG on impossible. You already know this. Also, I never wrote it like that.

We already got warned for posting off-topic, and I think modifying other people's posts just to spam will qualify as off topic too. Please stop spamming. This isn't the Crap section.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: quanto on May 03, 2009, 07:41:56 pm
nah...
if he got the swine flu, he'd be in bed sleeping, or in a hospital bed because his parents think the swine flu is more dangerous than the black plague

~i mean seriously, the news are satanic lying fuckers~
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 03, 2009, 07:46:07 pm
Quote from: tijitdamijit
I BEAT THE GUY ON IMPOSSIBLE: WATCH

He never really did claim he did it from very start to finish...
He just claims that he beat him on impossible.

Archael's argument was just destroyed.

Actually, hold up.

Look at what tijitdamijit posted:

I didn't start at Mike Haggar. I started at the beginning of the game. I started recording at the beginning of the Guy's castle.
Can we stop this now? It's getting on my nerves.

His claim is the entire game. Not just The Guy.

 :-\
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Lion on May 03, 2009, 07:46:49 pm
Quote from: tijitdamijit
I BEAT THE GUY ON IMPOSSIBLE: WATCH

He never really did claim he did it from very start to finish...
He just claims that he beat him on impossible.

Archael's argument was just destroyed.

If it was, then that means ijdntwbbr never did / claimed to have finished IWBTG on impossible.

 :)

Looks like you just admitted that no one's done it, then, including him.

No, your argument being destroyed means you failed, you fuck nut.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 03, 2009, 07:47:34 pm
Quote from: tijitdamijit
I BEAT THE GUY ON IMPOSSIBLE: WATCH

He never really did claim he did it from very start to finish...
He just claims that he beat him on impossible.

Archael's argument was just destroyed.

If it was, then that means ijdntwbbr never did / claimed to have finished IWBTG on impossible.

 :)

Looks like you just admitted that no one's done it, then, including him.

No, your argument being destroyed means you failed, you fuck nut.

Nah, read back a few pages:

I didn't start at Mike Haggar. I started at the beginning of the game. I started recording at the beginning of the Guy's castle.
Can we stop this now? It's getting on my nerves.


I don't see a full video anywhere. Sorry. I'm with Ellipsis on this one, once again.

Too easy to cheat to any screen in impossible.

Nice try but your trolling can still use improvement, JohnCougarMafoisi.

Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Lion on May 03, 2009, 07:51:25 pm
NOBODY
CARES!!!


Nice try but your trolling can still use improvement, JohnCougarMafoisi.

You're the one trolling, I'm a respected member.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: quanto on May 03, 2009, 07:51:36 pm
I didn't start at Mike Haggar. I started at the beginning of the game. I started recording at the beginning of the Guy's castle.
Can we stop this now? It's getting on my nerves.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Lion on May 03, 2009, 07:53:44 pm
I didn't start at Mike Haggar. I started at the beginning of the game. I started recording at the beginning of the Guy's castle.
Can we stop this now? It's getting on my nerves.

Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 03, 2009, 07:55:06 pm
You're the one trolling, I'm a respected member.

OH NO! A respected member!!

Let's sum this up.

@Archael: You're a fucking fagot, shut the fuck up and go away. :)

Here are 2 choices Archael.

1. Get your thumb out of your ass and go away.
2. Stick both thumbs up your ass and try to walk away on your elbows.

Either way, you should leave. ;D


So much for a respected member.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Fidel CashFlow on May 03, 2009, 07:55:50 pm
bahahahahahahahaha

keep this going!

your blatant ignorance and lack of faith makes me LAWL

EDIT: ARCHEAL! fuck off with the massive quotes
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Lion on May 03, 2009, 07:57:31 pm
Insulting retards like Sodra, Archael, PenisDude, etc. is supported.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 03, 2009, 07:57:57 pm
bahahahahahahahaha

keep this going!

your blatant ignorance and lack of faith makes me LAWL

People believing the claim of a full iwbtg impossible run when all they get to see is Mike Haggar --> The Guy is pretty lawl, too.

Quote
Insulting retards like Sodra, Archael, PenisDude, etc. is supported.

Hey man, nothing wrong with doubting BS evidence either.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Lion on May 03, 2009, 07:59:13 pm
EDIT: ARCHEAL! fuck off with the massive quotes

Now I bet he thinks your a troll.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 03, 2009, 08:00:38 pm
EDIT: ARCHEAL! fuck off with the massive quotes

Now I bet he thinks your a troll.

No. Nolan posted in this topic before, about the actual issue of these vids and the claim.

You started flaming from the first post, and probably haven't read half of it.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Lion on May 03, 2009, 08:02:03 pm
Where the hell is a mod? This needs to be locked!
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: quanto on May 03, 2009, 08:02:32 pm
just fuck off archael
tijitdamijit is one of the most helpful, kind, and awesome members here
he created iwbtfg
and shared the iwbtfg engine
he is awesome
do you honestly think that a person on the forums that people think is as awesome Obama can be proven wrong by a satanic slut like you?

~fuck, ninja'd~
~~200th post~~
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Lion on May 03, 2009, 08:04:03 pm
just fuck off archael
tijitdamijit is one of the most helpful, kind, and awesome members here
he created iwbtfg
and shared the iwbtfg engine
he is awesome
do you honestly think that a person on the forums that people think is as awesome Obama can be proven wrong by a satanic slut like you?

~fuck, ninja'd~
~~200th post~~

Now his retarded self thinks you're a troll, too.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 03, 2009, 08:04:31 pm
just fuck off archael
tijitdamijit is one of the most helpful, kind, and awesome members here
he created iwbtfg
and shared the iwbtfg engine
he is awesome

I am not doubting any of this, man. All of that actually has nothing to do with this topic.

I am sure he's an awesome dude.

I just don't think he finished IWBTG on impossible.

Quote
do you honestly think that a person on the forums that people think is as awesome Obama can be proven wrong by a satanic slut like you?

lol I am satanic now?  :)

Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: quanto on May 03, 2009, 08:05:25 pm
just fuck off archael
tijitdamijit is one of the most helpful, kind, and awesome members here
he created iwbtfg
and shared the iwbtfg engine
he is awesome
do you honestly think that a person on the forums that people think is as awesome Obama can be proven wrong by a satanic slut like you?

~fuck, ninja'd~
~~200th post~~

Now his retarded self thinks you're a troll, too.
if he does, i dont give a shit for a fuck bag
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 03, 2009, 08:06:38 pm
just fuck off archael
tijitdamijit is one of the most helpful, kind, and awesome members here
he created iwbtfg
and shared the iwbtfg engine
he is awesome
Now his retarded self thinks you're a troll, too.
if he does, i dont give a shit for a fuck bag

I don't think you're trolling right now.

It's just that those other great things you mentioned about tjdntmjdnt don't have anything to do with whether he finished IWBTG on impossible or not.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Lion on May 03, 2009, 08:06:58 pm
lol I am satanic now?  :)

If being the biggest dumbass on a forum is a sin, then yes, you are.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 03, 2009, 08:08:03 pm
lol I am satanic now?  :)

If being the biggest dumbass on a forum is a sin, then yes, you are.

Dumbass, why? Because I don't believe what is being claimed?

Big deal, dude. Not everyone is going to believe him based on that Mike Haggar --> The Guy video. I assure you I'm not the only one.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Lion on May 03, 2009, 08:08:49 pm
Archael.
(http://media.ign.com/boardfaces/56.gif)
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 03, 2009, 08:09:31 pm
Archael.
(http://media.ign.com/boardfaces/56.gif)

Dying your forum is dying!
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: quanto on May 03, 2009, 08:10:23 pm
lol I am satanic now?  :)

If being the biggest dumbass on a forum is a sin, then yes, you are.

Dumbass, why? Because I don't believe what is being claimed?

Big deal, dude. Not everyone is going to believe him based on that Mike Haggar --> The Guy video. I assure you I'm not the only one.
are you like 3?
if you dont care
just get off...
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Lion on May 03, 2009, 08:11:16 pm
lol I am satanic now?  :)

If being the biggest dumbass on a forum is a sin, then yes, you are.

Dumbass, why? Because I don't believe what is being claimed?

Big deal, dude. Not everyone is going to believe him based on that Mike Haggar --> The Guy video. I assure you I'm not the only one.
are you like 3?
if you dont care
just get off...

Exactly.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 03, 2009, 08:12:49 pm
lol I am satanic now?  :)

If being the biggest dumbass on a forum is a sin, then yes, you are.

Dumbass, why? Because I don't believe what is being claimed?

Big deal, dude. Not everyone is going to believe him based on that Mike Haggar --> The Guy video. I assure you I'm not the only one.
are you like 3?
if you dont care
just get off...

Yes. I am a 3 year old that posts on video game message boards!

Anyway, I didn't say I don't care. I like this game, but;

I said I don't believe it, and I am very surprised so many people here do based on that vid.

I'm surprised no one else has convinced you guys with videos like:

 Labyrinth --> The Guy
Ryu Hayabusa --> The Guy
Incinerator --> The Guy

Because you guys would believe all of them as a legit run of the entire thing on impossible.  ;D
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Lion on May 03, 2009, 08:15:58 pm
I can't stand this retard anymore!
Getting off.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: quanto on May 03, 2009, 08:26:00 pm
just fuck off archael
tijitdamijit is one of the most helpful, kind, and awesome members here
he created iwbtfg
and shared the iwbtfg engine
he is awesome
do you honestly think that a person on the forums that people think is as awesome Obama can be proven wrong by a satanic slut like you?


Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 03, 2009, 08:32:36 pm
just fuck off archael
tijitdamijit is one of the most helpful, kind, and awesome members here
he created iwbtfg
and shared the iwbtfg engine
he is awesome

I am not doubting any of this, man. All of that actually has nothing to do with this topic.

I am sure he's an awesome dude.

I just don't think he finished IWBTG on impossible.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Fidel CashFlow on May 03, 2009, 08:34:30 pm
No. Nolan posted in this topic before, about the actual issue of these vids and the claim.
WAIT... im not entirely 'here' right now..im kinda drifting in and out of conscience... is this quote making fun of me?



BAHAHAAHAHA

tiji must be PISSED OFFFFF... xD
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: quanto on May 03, 2009, 08:40:37 pm
Say hello to the rage of Kitty
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: tijit on May 03, 2009, 08:50:26 pm
Quote
tiji must be PISSED OFFFFF... xD
Actually no, I think this is hilarious


and for the people who didn't notice:
Quote
tijitdamijit
IWBTG Champion
Full Member

Posts: 156


I'm better than you, Archael
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Fidel CashFlow on May 03, 2009, 08:53:18 pm
xD
It's funny because it's true.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 03, 2009, 08:57:18 pm
that's been there for ahwile
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Arkhanno on May 03, 2009, 08:58:46 pm
Read it again. You're saying that it's not a fake, but he doesn't have the proof to prove otherwise, hence his claim is false. Since his claim is false that means he is lying about beating the game on Impossible and the whole thing is fake.

Again, I am not saying that his run is fake. I am saying that he has not shown proof for his claim of having beaten IWBTG on impossible.

Judge: Do you have any proof of your claim of innocence?
Defendant: No, sir, I don't.
Judge: Well, then, you must be innocent. You don't have proof, but you can't be lying.


There you go: I've shown you where you are wrong for the second time. I've even made it extremely easy to tell where you're wrong. Are you an anencephalic?

Wtf does the judge + defendant example have anything to do with this? Nice try.

Just because someone cannot present proof of innocence doesn't mean they are guilty.

This is the reason some innocent people are wrongly judged, it happens all the time. I can accuse tijitdamijit of being guilty, while he has no evidence to counter me, and he can still be telling the truth. This is actually a LIKELY scenario and is probably what is going on here in the first place.

How the fuck did this gain 8 pages while I was gone?

You obviously are an anencephalic. You couldn't even figure this out so I'll have to show you again. I'll say it slower and easier for you so you can understand.

You that you were being subjected to your own argument. The judge and defendant was symbolic of your claim of tijit not showing enough proof. tijit has shown us that he can get to The Guy and beat him on video. You keep saying that that isn't good enough for you; you keep saying that his third video is moot because you believe it's fake. Give us some evidence of it being fake or go the fuck away.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 03, 2009, 09:02:02 pm
How the fuck did this gain 8 pages while I was gone?

You obviously are an anencephalic. You couldn't even figure this out so I'll have to show you again. I'll say it slower and easier for you so you can understand.

You that you were being subjected to your own argument. The judge and defendant was symbolic of your claim of tijit not showing enough proof. tijit has shown us that he can get to The Guy and beat him on video. You keep saying that that isn't good enough for you; you keep saying that his third video is moot because you believe it's fake. Give us some evidence of it being fake or go the fuck away.

No, because according to your scenario, it is impossible for an innocent party that lacks proof of innocence to actually BE innocent. Read what you just quoted again.

It is possible for him to have no good proof of being innocent of my accusation and still be innocent.

Having proof of innocence is not a requirement of actually being innocent.

This is why many people get wrongly accused of something, and cannot prove their innocense, even though they are. Ever heard of wrongfully accused?


You obviously missed the part where I said this:

Quote
FYI to everyone trying to bend the "burden of proof" argument:

Although I am indeed saying that his proof isn't good enough, the OP is the person who made the claim of having beaten IWBTG in the first place. Burden of proof was on him and he did put up some videos, so it really comes down to whether you think those videos are proof enough for you or not.

Your counter-argument would be similar to the usual fallacy "You can't disprove god, therefor god must be real".

This is wrong.

Just because we don't have proof that his impossible run is fake does not automatically mean it's legit, either. If you choose to believe that it is legit (and that his proof is good enough to convince you), then more power to you.

Rest assured though, that YOUR BELIEF in his claim has ZERO impact on reality. And as far as his save files are concerned, we'll never get to verify that particular IWBTG run like has been mentioned in this thread before.

A full video from start to finish and then showing the save file after The Guy is dead would be very, very solid proof.

It's unfortunate the OP didn't provide anything like that.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: quanto on May 03, 2009, 09:05:24 pm
yes we have

go away
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Arkhanno on May 03, 2009, 09:38:37 pm
My scenario shows exactly what you're doing. He has evidence of beating IWBTG on impossible, you claim he has no proof. You're just walking around in circles: give us some evidence that it is fake or get the fuck out. If you don't want to do either, we'll just continue to laugh at you; it's really your choice.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 03, 2009, 10:01:18 pm
My scenario shows exactly what you're doing.

What I'm doing is saying his evidence sucks when measured against his claim.
His claim is having finished the entire thing, but his evidence is Mike Haggar ---> The Guy.

Quote
He has evidence of beating IWBTG on impossible, you claim he has no proof.

His evidence is Mike Haggar --> The Guy on impossible. His claim is having finished all of IWBTG on Impossible.

Of course I say he has no good proof, he doesn't.

Quote
You're just walking around in circles: give us some evidence that it is fake or get the fuck out.

I can't send you a copy of his save files and prove he is cheating. But I can explain to you why I, personally, don't believe it.

He recorded two videos of a failed run. Videos #1 and #2, which conclude in him dying at Mike Haggar. Then he records Video #3 of Mike Haggar ---> The Guy and claims he did the whole thing.

You guys tell me that he only recorded The Guy ---> Mike Haggar because he couldn't be bothered to re-record it, but that makes no sense, because he did record the entire thing during the run WHERE HE FAILED.

If he bothered to record and Upload the fail run, why wouldn't he bother recording the entire passing one?

Think about it.

Of course it is possible he is telling the truth, I never denied this.
I just said I don't believe him, and you are free to agree or disagree.

But you cannot tell me that he has established proof for his claim and that it's up to ME to disprove it, because he has none.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: JustOne on May 03, 2009, 10:03:32 pm
Okay..wow. I've been reading through this and i'd just like to say @ sodra and jcm, stop adding meaningless pages to this. Every time you say something Archael is just going to keep calling you a troll :/

Anyway @ Archael, you say that tjjit's video isn't enough proof because the first two videos are of the start to mike haggar and him dying and then the third is mike haggar to the guy and not a full run. Basically what you're saying is a person can't be trusted enough for you to believe that he completed the game with only a video of an incomplete run. Now this next part is going to be difficult because you've been jumping around with your arguement on weather you believe tjjit did it or not.

If you do believe tjjit did it then you're just being a dick about this and looking for someone to argue with. Yes, there isn't any infallibe proof because there isn't a full uncut video but if you believe he can and did do it, then stop stirring shit up about there not being a complete video. There is reasonable proof of him getting to mike haggar and dying on impossible. With this it is reasonable to assume that he can and did do it again. Furthermore there is proof of him finishing from haggar to the guy. Yes this is not proof of a full run however you should not be so stubborn as to assume that he did not do the whole game up to that part if the first two videos are evidence enough to prove that he did it the first time.

If you do not believe he did it then you are trying to discredit tjjit. In order to not believe that he did it, obviously you must believe that the first two videos aren't enough proof of his ability to get through the game on impossible, therefore making you think the first two videos are recordings of a lucky run. You then go on to say that the third video is a fake in which the save is hacked to start at mike haggar room or something ridiculous like that.

Either way, you argueing about this is not going anywhere. We trust in tjjit enough to believe his claim along with the amount of proof he has presented so there's really no hope in you discrediting him. And if you're just being a dick then stfu please because it's annoying >:/
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 03, 2009, 10:07:23 pm
If you do believe tjjit did it then you're just being a dick about this and looking for someone to argue with.

I don't.

Quote
Yes, there isn't any infallibe proof because there isn't a full uncut video but if you believe he can and did do it, then stop stirring shit up about there not being a complete video. There is reasonable proof of him getting to mike haggar and dying on impossible. With this it is reasonable to assume that he can and did do it again. Furthermore there is proof of him finishing from haggar to the guy.

Yes this is not proof of a full run however you should not be so stubborn as to assume that he did not do the whole game up to that part if the first two videos are evidence enough to prove that he did it the first time. If you do not believe he did it then you are trying to discredit tjjit. In order to not believe that he did it, obviously you must believe that the first two videos aren't enough proof of his ability to get through the game on impossible, therefore making you think the first two videos are recordings of a lucky run. You then go on to say that the third video is a fake in which the save is hacked to start at mike haggar room or something ridiculous like that.

You understand exactly what I'm trying to say, thank you.

Quote
Either way, you argueing about this is not going anywhere. We trust in tjjit enough to believe his claim along with the amount of proof he has presented so there's really no hope in you discrediting him. And if you're just being a dick then stfu please because it's annoying >:/

You are right. I guess we'll have to settle that some believe him based on those videos and some won't. I'm happy that someone could understand why someone WOULDN'T believe it, though. Thank you for not needing to resort to "fagg0t" and "gtfo" to get your points across.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Kokojo on May 03, 2009, 10:10:23 pm
I'd like to point out, this time, he's not a dick, he's giving his opinion on what he think matter.

titjit like a formidable player, and extremely skilled, he could have done IWBTG on impossible, but i still doupt it because there is not concrete, 100% proof and that what i want to see. I also wonder why he does not state cleary why he starts of at mike hagard in ''part 3''.

That is all.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Arkhanno on May 03, 2009, 11:05:02 pm
"What I'm doing is saying his evidence sucks when measured against his claim."

You're still doing the same thing. Remember the defendant and judge scenario? You don't have any proof of his videos being fake, but you keep saying that it isn't proof of beating Impossible. He has proof of it being the real deal, so go and find some errors in the video that could result from possible tampering. If you find something, come back; if you don't then stay the fuck away.

"His evidence is Mike Haggar --> The Guy on impossible."

"I can't send you a copy of his save files and prove he is cheating."

I still laugh every time you say 'Mike Haggar to The Guy'. I'm sure it's been pointed out before, but it just proves that you haven't seen the video and you have no idea what you're talking about.

"Thank you for not needing to resort to "fagg0t" and "gtfo" to get your points across."

That doesn't 'get the point across', it's showing that we don't care for your opinion and you should go away. I'm through posting in this topic. I'm just going to laugh at you. Have fun being retarded. :)
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Archael on May 03, 2009, 11:07:43 pm
I still laugh every time you say 'Mike Haggar to The Guy'. I'm sure it's been pointed out before, but it just proves that you haven't seen the video and you have no idea what you're talking about.

I saw the video. Video #3 starts at Mike Haggar.
Title: Re: [s]At the Guy on Impossible[/s] I beat The Guy on Impossible
Post by: Dagnarok on May 03, 2009, 11:21:08 pm
ALRIGHT!  THAT'S ENOUGH!!!

I, and I'm sure several others are, am tired of having to show up here and STILL see people arguing over this subject.  Honestly, have any of you people accomplished something by posting over and Over and OVER AGAIN!?!?

I stopped posting when I realized I wasn't accomplishing anything.  WHY HAVEN'T ANY OF YOU DONE THE SAME!??!

You either agree tijit's done the "Impossible" or you don't.  Enough said.  Now don't have me decide that I should try to get a few of you banned for awhile just because you're lacking a little something called self-control!

I only have myself to blame for this whole mess.  I learned my lesson; now it's your turn.

Thread Locked.